Volume 1, Issue 1, 2021
Articles

Measuring the Success of Moodle at Kristu Jayanti College – Bangalore

PDF
  • Sevugapandian A.,
  • Ayshwarya B.,
  • Dhanamalar M.,
  • Ramanathan G.
Sevugapandian A.
Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru
Ayshwarya B.
Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru
Dhanamalar M.
Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru
Ramanathan G.
Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59176/kjcs.v1i1.1263

Published 2020-11-03

Keywords

  • Moodle, Learning Management Systems (LMS), Open Source.

How to Cite

A., S., B., A., M., D., & G., R. (2020). Measuring the Success of Moodle at Kristu Jayanti College – Bangalore. Kristu Jayanti Journal of Computational Sciences (KJCS), 1(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.59176/kjcs.v1i1.1263
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The main idea of this study is to decide the goal of supporting the utilization of a LMS (Learning Management System) under Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (Moodle), in the formation of virtual study rooms in Kristu Jayanti College. This present examination's goal is to decide the expectation of utilizing Moodle to create virtual study halls: Information Quality, System Quality, Complimentary Technology, Self-Efficacy Measure, Service Quality, User Satisfaction, Use and Perceived Net Benefits. The eight parameters mentioned here build the general attributes of Moodle which likewise help breakdown a superior comprehension of the accomplishment of the Kristu jayanti college learning the executives framework. So as to gauge the achievement of Moodle, 120 students were assessed based on these eight parameters in the moodle. The point of this assessment was to examine the client experience of utilizing MOODLE and furthermore the advantages and hindrances towards its utilization. The consequences of the investigation would be helpful to the organizations attempting to coordinate innovation in their instructing and learning measures.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Livingstone, Sonia. "Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education." Oxford review of education 38.1 (2012):pp. 9-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577938
  2. Cole, Robert A., ed. Issues in Web-based pedagogy: A critical primer. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000.
  3. López-Pérez, M. "Victoria & M. Pérez-López, and Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza. 2011." Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes."." Computers & Education 56: 818826.Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011), pp. 818–826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
  4. Kim, J. K., & Kim, D. J.,A meta-analysis on relations between e-learning research trends and effectiveness of learning. International Journal of Smart Home, DOI:10.14257/ijsh.2013.7.6.0, 7(6), (2013). pp.35–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2013.7.6.04
  5. Alshibly, Haitham Hmoud. "Evaluating E-HRM success: A validation of the information systems success model." International Journal of Human Resource Studies 4.3 (2014): 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i3.5929
  6. DeLone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable." Information systems research 3.1 (1992): pp.60-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  7. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R., The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), (2003). pp.9-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  8. Ellis, R. (2009). A field guide to learning management systems. USA: American Society of Training and Development (ASTD).
  9. Fındık-Coşkunçay, D., Alkış, N., & Özkan-Yıldırım, S, A Structural Model for Students’ Adoption of Learning Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation in the Higher Education Context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), (2018), pp. 13–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t70573-000
  10. Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E., A model for evaluating e-learning systems quality in higher education in developing countries. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 13(2), (2017), pp. 186–204.
  11. Jebari, K., Boussedra, F., & Ettouhami, A, Teaching “Information Systems Management” with Moodle. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, (2017), 12(4), pp. 4–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6183
  12. Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F., Choosing the Right Learning Management System (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), (2016). pp. 55–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
  13. Lawler, A, LMS transitioning to Moodle: A surprising case of successful, emergent change management. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), (2011).. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.907
  14. Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E., Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European journal of information systems, 17(3), (2008), pp. 236263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  15. Sharma, A., & Vatta, S., Role of learning management systems in education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(6), (2013).
  16. Wan, A. T., How can learners learn from experience? A case study in blended learning at higher education. International journal of information and education technology, 5(8), (2015), pp. 615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.578

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.